Fundamentação da metafísica dos costumes has ratings and reviews. The Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals or Groundwork of the. Immanuel Kant – A metafisica dos costumes. Almeida Neto. Uploaded by. Almeida Neto. Loading Preview. Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can . FUNDAMENTAÇÃO DA METAFÍSICA DOS COSTUMES – CRÍTICA DA RAZÃO PRÁTICA by KANT, Immanuel and a great selection of similar Used, New and.
|Published (Last):||13 January 2011|
|PDF File Size:||17.87 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.58 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Fundamentação da metafísica dos costumes
The professional and arm-chair “philosophers” who extol the brilliance of Kant are fools. I would like to read the translated book of Kant about ethics but I do not know how to access it please help me.
I strongly believe less people should read this drivel. Or maybe he’d actually be really entertaining, since his communication style is just not meant to be understandable? Lists with This Book.
Immanuel Kant – A metafisica dos costumes | Almeida Neto –
He concluded that all objects that the mind can think about must conform to its manner of thought. Like I said, the book is a complete failure from the start, because it starts from a faulty assumption. Therefore if the mind can think only in terms of causality—which he concluded that it does—then we can know prior to experiencing them that all objects we experience must either be a cause or an effect.
He wants to determine how a “pure will” should behave and thus comes with the definition of the famous categorical imperative.
It’s partly because of this he decided to publish the Critique of Practical Reason in Feel free to disagree. He asked if an object can be known to have certain properties prior to the experience of that object. Kant continues to be a major mwtafisica on philosophy to this day, influencing both Analytic and Continental philosophy. Kant is the Nostradamus of philosophy.
Swapna Bhasker rated it did not like it Feb 16, Published by Porto Editora first published To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. That’s not really a point in Kant’s favor, either; just proof that his quest was foolish, and his writing less than clear. And then, the concepts themselves Asha rated it did not like it Aug 27, Kant’s argument works from common reason up to the supreme unconditional law, in order to identify its existence.
Yes Kant was a bad writer- horrible even. The empiricists believed that knowledge is acquired thru experience alone, but the rationalists maintained that such knowledge is open to Cartesian doubt and that reason alone provides us with knowledge.
Pursuing metaphysics involves asking questions about the ultimate nature of reality. Open Preview See a Problem? Rachel Vasser rated it did not like it Jan 10, But as this “pure will” surely doesn’t exist and nothing in between is really explored, we’re left with little of interest. Books by Immanuel Kant.
The book strays so far from reality that it’s Boy, Kant must’ve been awful at parties. The Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals or Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der SittenImmanuel Kant’s 1st contribution to moral philosophy, argues for an a priori basis for morality.
Anna rated it did not like it Jan 23, The Groundwork is broken into a preface, followed by three sections.
Fundamentação da metafísica dos costumes by Immanuel Kant (1 star ratings)
Although “there is always some reason in madness,” there is very little reason to be found in Kant’s madness. The book is a complete failure from the start, because Kant attempts to explain morals from a purely reason standpoint, and makes the faulty assumption that reason, like morals, is self evident, and the reason test is all is needed to proclaim what is universally moral. Actually, Kant’s works are nothing more than the products of a deranged mind. From what I could gather, Kant thinks the only truly moral act is one in which the actor has no experience of reward nor any personal inclination to perform the act.
Here’s the problem, if reason dictates that some races are more inferior than others, then the Holocaust is morally acceptable. Courtney rated it did not like it Oct 15, It’s just depressing how many times i find this callous philosophy interjecting and subjegating my life. Want to Metagisica Currently Reading Read. The one thing I can say for this little tract: No trivia or quizzes yet.
Nika rated it did not like it Apr 23, xostumes The philosophers Fichte, Schelling, Hegel and Schopenhauer saw themselves as correcting and expanding Kant’s system, thus bringing about various forms of German Idealism.
His most important work is The Critique of Pure Reasonan investigation of reason itself. This one nearly destroyed me.
Return to Book Page.